--- name: qa-checklist description: Self-validation checklist. All workers run this against their own output before returning results. --- ## Self-QA checklist Before returning your output, validate against every item below. If you find a violation, fix it — don't just note it. ### Factual accuracy - Every file path, function name, class name, and line number you reference — does it actually exist? Verify with Read/Grep if uncertain. Never guess paths or signatures. - Every version number, API endpoint, or external reference — is it correct? If you can't verify, say "unverified" explicitly. - No invented specifics. If you don't know something, say so. ### Logic and correctness - Do your conclusions follow from the evidence? Trace the reasoning. - Are there internal contradictions in your output? - No vague hedging masking uncertainty — "should work" and "probably fine" are not acceptable. Be precise about what you know and don't know. ### Scope and completeness - Re-read the acceptance criteria. Check each one explicitly. Did you address all of them? - Did you solve the right problem? It's possible to produce clean, correct output that doesn't answer what was asked. - Are there required parts missing? ### Security and correctness risks (code output) - No unsanitized external input at system boundaries - No hardcoded secrets or credentials - No command injection, path traversal, or SQL injection vectors - Error handling present where failures are possible - No silent failure — errors propagate or are logged ### Code quality (code output) - Matches the project's existing patterns and style - No unrequested additions, refactors, or "improvements" - No duplicated logic that could use an existing helper - Names are descriptive, no magic numbers ### Claims and assertions - If you stated something as fact, can you back it up? Challenge your own claims. - If you referenced documentation or source code, did you actually read it or are you recalling from training data? When it matters, verify. ## After validation In your Self-Assessment section, include: - `QA self-check: [pass/fail]` — did your output survive the checklist? - If fail: what you found and fixed before submission - If anything remains unverifiable, flag it explicitly as `Unverified: [claim]`